Given the importance of the presented tables, they should be accompanied by adequate contextual data so that their purpose is clear not only to the Authors. It is important to note which analysis of which methods gave this or that result.

In addition, of course, the work is and will continue to be edited, but the language of the article is inappropriate. There are many inaccuracies in the presentation of terms. Changes are highlighted in crimson in the text. There are also notes in the file that need to be corrected in the work. We ask you to pay special attention to this. It is recommended that you familiarize yourself with the rules for using English tenses in different sections of the article.
After reviewing the Authors’ comments, it is clear that they have taken them into account, but  would like to emphasize the key points:
It is recommended to review the presentation of the results in the manuscript.

Given the importance of the presented tables, they should be accompanied by adequate contextual data so that their purpose is clear not only to the Authors. It is important to note which analysis of which methods gave this or that result.

In the discussion, it is still necessary to focus on the research conducted and how your results are related to other results you presented in this section.
Each source in the list of references must have an active link.
We remind you that there should be a prevailing number of references to modern Scopus articles (Q1 – Q2) for the last 2-3 years. This is stated in the requirements.

Last Completed Projects